Pornography is normalising a “sexist raunch culture” in schools which is putting pressure on girls to share explicit images with boys.
Can the intentional or unintended distribution of a users #OnlyFans content be considered a criminal offence under intimate image abuse law?
UK porn company OnlyFans are to block Porn from October 2021 on its platform. The announcement came as the company faces future funding difficulties from venture capitalists and payment processors such as Mastercard and Visa. This move only highlights how individuals profit enormously from sexual exploitation.
There are hidden risks for adults using dating apps. They are proving to be a personal information overshare nightmare for many users, which very few even realise.
The IWF and the NSPCC’s Childline UK have launched a Sexual Image Removal Tool for Children. This will afford some comfort to parents and children where sexual content has been shared online.
When Priya’s boyfriend posted a nude photo of her online, he told her it would give her a confidence boost by making her an object of desire for other men.
Instead she felt powerless knowing that someone she loved had shared an intimate photo without her consent.
Today Mastercard suddenly reveald that it would no longer process payments for Pornhub, one of the world’s most popular adult websites, after it found “unlawful content” on the platform.
This comes in the wake of serious allegations that Pornhub not only hosted sexual assault, revenge porn and child abuse, they monatised and profited from the content.
The news that an online protest is being organised to campaign to introduce legislation to address, Revenge Porn is welcomed.
This is more appropriately known as Image Based Abuse. It comes after tens of thousands of incidents of image-based sexual abuse were identified as being uploaded and shared on a number of online forums.
You must be logged in to post a comment.